discussion your experiences with writing 1

Discussion: Your Experiences With Writing
Scholarly writing is a key component of your graduate work. A useful first step toward improving your writing skills is to examine your past experience with writing, including your writing strengths and weaknesses. From there, you can target your needs accordingly.
For this Discussion, you will explore the various resources and guidelines outlining an effective writing process and some common writing issues. You will also review the current state of your writing skills and share thoughts and experiences with your colleagues.
This Discussion will also be used to help tailor the individualized feedback provided by your Instructor throughout the duration of the course.
To prepare for this Discussion

Review and complete the Self-Assessment found in the Learning Resources to develop your needs and goals for this course.
Reflect on your writing and identify two to three specific areas of concern about your writing that you would like to address.
Also, consider any particular writing strengths or strategies that may support your writing.

******Post a 1- to 2-paragraph reflection on your writing needs, identifying at least one specific writing issue you want to address in this class. You may also include any writing strengths or strategies that may support your writing. Be sure to connect your scholarly writing skills with professional and academic goals.

Resourses:
https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U…
https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U…
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/te…
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/wr…

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: CAEX_6050_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View
List View

Exemplary
Acceptable
Approaching Acceptable
Needs Significant Improvement

Clarity and completeness of ideas

5 (25%) – 5 (25%)
Clear patterns of idea formation. Compelling reasons, detail, and/or examples are provided

4 (20%) – 4 (20%)
Idea formation lacks sufficient evidence and support. Reasons, detail, and/or examples are included but are not clearly linked to the idea.

3 (15%) – 3 (15%)
Evidence or support for ideas is poorly developed. Vague or unsupported reasons, details, and/or examples are given.

0 (0%) – 2 (10%)
No attempt has been made to tie ideas to evidence or logic. No reasons, detail, or examples are given.

Grammar/mechanics

5 (25%) – 5 (25%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are exemplary.

4 (20%) – 4 (20%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are mostly consistent with the conventions of academic English.

3 (15%) – 3 (15%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are not consistent with conventions of academic English.

0 (0%) – 2 (10%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are unacceptable for scholarly writing.

Addressing task

5 (25%) – 5 (25%)
Addresses all aspects of the task fully and completely.

4 (20%) – 4 (20%)
Addresses the task with occasional divergences and/or omissions.

3 (15%) – 3 (15%)
Attempts to address the task but leaves important areas of question unanswered.

0 (0%) – 2 (10%)
Response does not address the task.

Responses to other students

5 (25%) – 5 (25%)
Responds in a thoughtful or probing way to extend the conversation.

4 (20%) – 4 (20%)
Minimal response to two classmates.

3 (15%) – 3 (15%)
Responds to only one classmate completely or to two classmates incompletely.

0 (0%) – 2 (10%)
Does not respond or responds superficially.

Total Points: 20

Name: CAEX_6050_Discussion_Rubric

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post discussion your experiences with writing 1 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get a Discount!